Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 220:3
לא צריכא דיהביה לידעיה במשמרתו דיהויריב מאי מי אמרינן כיון דלאו משמרתו הוא ולא כלום הוא או דלמא כיון דלא חזי ליה מעיקרא לידעיה קאי תיקו
during the time of the division of Jehoiarib. Now, what would be the law? Shall we say that since it was not in the time of his division, the restoration is of no avail, or perhaps since it would not do for Jehoiarib it was destined from the very outset to go to Jedaiah? — Let this stand undecided. Raba again asked: May the priests set [one payment for] a robbery committed upon a proselyte against another [payment for a] robbery committed upon a proselyte? Shall we say that since the Divine Law designated it <i>trespass</i>,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 643, n. 8. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 220:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.